Total Commodity Programs in Grant County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 396
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $7,222,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $992,135 |
| 2 | First International Bank & Trust ** | Elgin, ND 58533 | $215,427 |
| 3 | Blue Hill Ranch Gp | Leith, ND 58529 | $167,796 |
| 4 | Terry Nagel | Carson, ND 58529 | $134,891 |
| 5 | Mark And Tera Meyer Jv | Morristown, SD 57645 | $116,080 |
| 6 | David Allen Kuntz | Elgin, ND 58533 | $115,577 |
| 7 | Timmy Lee Muggli | Carson, ND 58529 | $111,782 |
| 8 | Darrell Lee Erhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $108,959 |
| 9 | Clifford Henry Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $104,992 |
| 10 | Cindy Lou Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $104,992 |
| 11 | David Wayne Muggli | Carson, ND 58529 | $104,256 |
| 12 | Shannon L Horst | Elgin, ND 58533 | $92,516 |
| 13 | Joel James Klein | Elgin, ND 58533 | $87,206 |
| 14 | Brandon Bertch Farm And Ranch Inc. | Carson, ND 58529 | $87,154 |
| 15 | Direct Ag Supply, Inc | Mandan, ND 58554 | $86,182 |
| 16 | Brent David Erhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $85,641 |
| 17 | David Paul Sprenger | Elgin, ND 58533 | $85,175 |
| 18 | Delmar Arthur Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $69,421 |
| 19 | Brian Lynn Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $67,422 |
| 20 | Amber Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $67,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf