Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 486
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $16,471,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $534,219 |
2 | Jonathan & Robin Stang-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $435,210 |
3 | Shane & Stacey Hertz-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $332,267 |
4 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $277,047 |
5 | Kelly Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $204,935 |
6 | Amy Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $204,935 |
7 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $200,652 |
8 | Gary Dean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $188,088 |
9 | Tia Marie Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $188,088 |
10 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $178,497 |
11 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $178,497 |
12 | Nathan John Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $177,144 |
13 | Sheri Ann Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $175,838 |
14 | Jonathan Chris Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $173,973 |
15 | Dakota Western Bank | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $172,796 |
16 | Blickensderfer Farms | Mott, ND 58646 | $170,168 |
17 | Daxon A Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $152,658 |
18 | Jerald N Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $150,984 |
19 | Dion Dale Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $146,457 |
20 | Bnc National Bank ** | Linton, ND 58552 | $146,266 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>