Farm Subsidy information
Kidder County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kidder County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 586
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $23,927,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $500,560 |
2 | Dawson Farms | Dawson, ND 58428 | $463,446 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $229,646 |
4 | Double-r Potatoes Llp | Pingree, ND 58476 | $223,089 |
5 | Meier Farms | Steele, ND 58482 | $221,776 |
6 | Van Ray Cousins | Pingree, ND 58476 | $214,487 |
7 | James John Cusey | Steele, ND 58482 | $204,590 |
8 | Meredith Laree Cusey | Steele, ND 58482 | $204,590 |
9 | Van Ray Brothers Partnership | Pingree, ND 58476 | $190,296 |
10 | Whitman Ranch | Robinson, ND 58478 | $182,808 |
11 | R & C Mittleider Farms Inc | Tappen, ND 58487 | $173,905 |
12 | Choice Financial Group ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $157,538 |
13 | Dakota Heritage Bank Of North Dak ** | Hope, ND 58046 | $128,862 |
14 | Miles Benz | Steele, ND 58482 | $128,063 |
15 | Robin L Ziesch | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $119,149 |
16 | Gary Charles Scherbenske | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $117,750 |
17 | Calvin J Leno | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $115,518 |
18 | Neil Fanta | Dawson, ND 58428 | $114,302 |
19 | Larry L Dockter | Medina, ND 58467 | $113,340 |
20 | Dean Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $108,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>