Market Gains in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $767,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rudolph Ervin Peltz | New Salem, ND 58563 | $49,162 |
| 2 | Dale Craig Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $47,094 |
| 3 | Wilbert Lee Fisher Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $35,871 |
| 4 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $33,358 |
| 5 | August Joseph Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $26,970 |
| 6 | Marshall Feland | Mandan, ND 58554 | $22,947 |
| 7 | Mike J Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $21,353 |
| 8 | Matt Doll Estate | Mandan, ND 58554 | $20,413 |
| 9 | William M Rhodes Jr | Umatilla, FL 32784 | $20,150 |
| 10 | Bailey Enterprises Inc | Mc Cool Junction, NE 68401 | $16,434 |
| 11 | Rodney Warren Rusch | New Salem, ND 58563 | $16,121 |
| 12 | Dennis Jerome Renner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $16,075 |
| 13 | Leslie Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $15,705 |
| 14 | Ronald Lee Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $14,539 |
| 15 | Dale Allen Neidhardt | New Salem, ND 58563 | $14,415 |
| 16 | Larry Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $14,047 |
| 17 | Doll Farm Enterprises | New Salem, ND 58563 | $13,688 |
| 18 | Richard Michael Schirado | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $12,306 |
| 19 | Wilbert O Fisher | Solen, ND 58570 | $12,134 |
| 20 | Annette Helen Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $12,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf