Farm Subsidy information
Pembina County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Pembina County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,284
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $735,608,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Johnson Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $8,775,990 |
2 | Longtin Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $5,774,633 |
3 | Bjornstad Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $4,412,614 |
4 | Bernhoft Farms | Mountain, ND 58262 | $4,274,122 |
5 | Rgm Farms Randall R Emanuelson Etal Ptr | Drayton, ND 58225 | $3,982,277 |
6 | Wilwand Farms | Pembina, ND 58271 | $3,502,957 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $3,419,958 |
8 | Vivatson Bros | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $3,335,106 |
9 | Halls | Edinburg, ND 58227 | $3,246,684 |
10 | Heuchert Willow Creek Ranch | Hensel, ND 58241 | $3,104,837 |
11 | Morrison Farms | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $2,938,725 |
12 | Sproule Farms | Grand Forks, ND 58208 | $2,641,325 |
13 | Gary Douglas Warner | Pembina, ND 58271 | $2,600,650 |
14 | T E Otoole Farms | Crystal, ND 58222 | $2,524,534 |
15 | Myrdal Brothers | Edinburg, ND 58227 | $2,393,511 |
16 | Lyle Shephard | Crystal, ND 58222 | $2,367,487 |
17 | Kelly James Meagher | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $2,328,847 |
18 | Mcmartin/ronald Sr & Bonita Jv | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $2,298,565 |
19 | Wilwand Grain | Pembina, ND 58271 | $2,189,290 |
20 | Mahar Farms | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $2,171,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>