Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Renville County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Renville County, North Dakota totaled $1,552,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sheldon Melvin Ackerson | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $149,997 |
2 | K & A Bahl Farm Inc | Minot, ND 58701 | $136,996 |
3 | Loren Dean Guidinger | Minot, ND 58703 | $106,811 |
4 | Grant Marshal Guidinger | Minot, ND 58703 | $99,761 |
5 | Bradley Kyle Moberg | Mohall, ND 58761 | $99,758 |
6 | Lloyd E Gates Farms Inc | Mohall, ND 58761 | $88,448 |
7 | Del Gates Farms Inc | Mohall, ND 58761 | $88,437 |
8 | Eric Jerome Moberg | Mohall, ND 58761 | $85,495 |
9 | Steven Todd Olson | Mohall, ND 58761 | $79,293 |
10 | Nancy Jo Olson | Mohall, ND 58761 | $79,293 |
11 | James Craig Limke | Lansford, ND 58750 | $57,115 |
12 | Guy Alfred Solemsaas | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $51,891 |
13 | Gary Lynn Bryans | Minot, ND 58701 | $51,239 |
14 | Brian Eugene Knutson | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $50,961 |
15 | Brian Wilbur Johnson | Mohall, ND 58761 | $49,174 |
16 | David Russell Steeves | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $44,806 |
17 | Donald Norman Ackerson | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $40,470 |
18 | Mark Jay Cook | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $34,178 |
19 | James Southam | Sherwood, ND 58782 | $27,120 |
20 | Philip L Zimmer | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $24,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>