Farm Subsidy information
Rolette County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Rolette County, North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rolette County, North Dakota totaled $28,982,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dacotah Bank ** | Rolla, ND 58367 | $644,122 |
| 2 | Absolute Honey LLC | Mylo, ND 58353 | $494,166 |
| 3 | Drift Prairie Farm | Rolla, ND 58367 | $442,934 |
| 4 | Mccloud Farm | Rolla, ND 58367 | $412,387 |
| 5 | Hudson Farms | Rolla, ND 58367 | $334,879 |
| 6 | Curtis Allan Haman | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $300,313 |
| 7 | Mark R Heinz | Rolette, ND 58366 | $275,488 |
| 8 | Tri S Farms Inc | Wolford, ND 58385 | $274,916 |
| 9 | Mark Martinson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $249,339 |
| 10 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $248,981 |
| 11 | Brian R Berube | Mandan, ND 58554 | $233,198 |
| 12 | William Patrick Mongeon | Rolette, ND 58366 | $217,232 |
| 13 | David Allan Pederson | Rolla, ND 58367 | $214,674 |
| 14 | Dan Marvin Pederson | Rolla, ND 58367 | $214,674 |
| 15 | Ryan Dale Pederson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $206,313 |
| 16 | Steven James Grenier | Rolette, ND 58366 | $201,367 |
| 17 | Meghan M Grenier | Rolette, ND 58366 | $200,636 |
| 18 | Toby Lee Armstrong | Rolette, ND 58366 | $189,873 |
| 19 | Steven Lee Lewis | Mylo, ND 58353 | $187,486 |
| 20 | Jennifer Pederson | Rolette, ND 58366 | $187,191 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf