Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 229
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $14,205,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Faul Farms | Martin, ND 58758 | $876,987 |
2 | Frueh Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $594,766 |
3 | M & B Faul Farms | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $584,890 |
4 | Steichen Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $515,575 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $353,644 |
6 | Miller Family Farm | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $283,491 |
7 | Chadwick Scott Rauser | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $260,343 |
8 | Steven Kent Erdmann | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $256,100 |
9 | Douglas Mark Erdmann | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $255,481 |
10 | Michael Richter | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $242,040 |
11 | Roddy Lynn Schilling | Mercer, ND 58559 | $227,541 |
12 | Larry Lee Kaibel | Drake, ND 58736 | $207,430 |
13 | Kelly James Nitz | Harvey, ND 58341 | $206,149 |
14 | Sheldon Leonard Oster | Drake, ND 58736 | $193,741 |
15 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $191,424 |
16 | Christopher H Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $191,424 |
17 | Mark Alan Abrahamson | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $183,129 |
18 | Thomas William Abrahamson | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $183,129 |
19 | James Mark Pellman | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $180,124 |
20 | Damon J Tessmann | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $174,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>