Loan Deficiency in Ward County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,078
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Ward County, North Dakota totaled $52,113,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flatland Farms | Berthold, ND 58718 | $633,996 |
| 2 | Kenneth Leroy Rustad | Roseglen, ND 58775 | $492,375 |
| 3 | Lee Farms | Berthold, ND 58718 | $453,005 |
| 4 | Joseph Nelson Farm Inc | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $436,368 |
| 5 | Craig Gordon Birdsall | Carpio, ND 58725 | $357,394 |
| 6 | Mark Allen Birdsall | Berthold, ND 58718 | $350,048 |
| 7 | Everett Max Dobrinski | Makoti, ND 58756 | $330,296 |
| 8 | J D Zeltinger Farms Inc | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $327,205 |
| 9 | Richard Leon Haugeberg | Max, ND 58759 | $311,025 |
| 10 | Zimmer Farm Inc | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $305,746 |
| 11 | Michael Wayne Roark | Berthold, ND 58718 | $296,509 |
| 12 | Stanley Kurt Vangsness | Berthold, ND 58718 | $280,620 |
| 13 | Nicholas Michael Schumacher | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $271,214 |
| 14 | Curtis Leroy Krueger | Max, ND 58759 | $270,197 |
| 15 | Dennis Stanley Krueger | Max, ND 58759 | $270,196 |
| 16 | Franklin Dale Anderson | Donnybrook, ND 58734 | $260,979 |
| 17 | Behm Farms | Burlington, ND 58722 | $259,867 |
| 18 | Jeff Allan Krueger | Max, ND 58759 | $258,113 |
| 19 | Michael Harry Smith | Minot, ND 58701 | $256,859 |
| 20 | M And S Anderson Farms | Minot, ND 58703 | $254,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf