Farm Subsidy information
Columbiana County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Columbiana County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 340
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbiana County, Ohio totaled $5,175,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bernet Farms LLC | Hanoverton, OH 44423 | $258,165 |
| 2 | Hillcrest Farms LLC | Columbiana, OH 44408 | $196,020 |
| 3 | Myron Wehr Farms LLC | New Waterford, OH 44445 | $156,459 |
| 4 | R & P Kiko Family Farms Ltd | Salem, OH 44460 | $152,223 |
| 5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $142,970 |
| 6 | Robert N Black | Rogers, OH 44455 | $134,719 |
| 7 | Mcmaster Farms LLC | Columbiana, OH 44408 | $115,355 |
| 8 | Hanover Farms LLC | Hanoverton, OH 44423 | $102,152 |
| 9 | Nature View Farms LLC | Salem, OH 44460 | $97,431 |
| 10 | Bruce L Woolf | Winona, OH 44493 | $88,461 |
| 11 | Whiteleather Farms | Minerva, OH 44657 | $80,896 |
| 12 | Pine Hill Jersey Farm LLC | New Waterford, OH 44445 | $70,938 |
| 13 | Kevin Baker | New Waterford, OH 44445 | $68,367 |
| 14 | Unity Farms | East Palestine, OH 44413 | $63,042 |
| 15 | Thompson Farms Inc | Hanoverton, OH 44423 | $58,671 |
| 16 | Dale Lowmiller | Minerva, OH 44657 | $57,515 |
| 17 | Michael Norkus | Salem, OH 44460 | $53,726 |
| 18 | M & C Chamberlain Farms LLC | Columbiana, OH 44408 | $53,647 |
| 19 | Cold Run Jerseys LLC | Salem, OH 44460 | $52,398 |
| 20 | Dean R Farmer | Lisbon, OH 44432 | $49,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf