Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,964

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $297,996,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$7,671,193
2Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$4,048,109
3Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,508,698
4Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$2,332,050
5Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,324,084
6John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,254,642
7Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$1,958,646
8Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,935,458
9Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,897,440
10David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$1,738,506
11Martin Land CoJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,627,974
12Conn Farms IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,608,285
13Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,531,971
14Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,507,654
15Gary Ward CockerillLeesburg, OH 45135$1,481,513
16Meerland Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,452,555
17Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,428,525
18Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,340,737
19Ted William WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,318,680
20Robert Owen LanmanSabina, OH 45169$1,292,927

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag