Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 638

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $19,302,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2019
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$682,631
2Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$423,153
3Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$320,534
4Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$264,909
5Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$262,546
6Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$257,111
7Bonham Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$241,160
8Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$240,507
9Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$240,507
10Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$222,737
11Fannin Ag. LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$222,631
12Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$214,107
13Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$206,100
14Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$198,634
15Whitney Grain And Cattle LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$173,052
16David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$172,780
17John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$172,671
18Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$161,106
19Waddle Family Farms Operating LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$156,976
20Schaefer Family Farms LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$156,961

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag