Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $35,328 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Don J Melvin | Washington Ch, OH 43160 | $6,874 |
| 2 | John C Melvin | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,316 |
| 3 | John R Frost | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $3,052 |
| 4 | William Brandt | Wshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160 | $2,955 |
| 5 | John A Grice | Washington Ch, OH 43160 | $1,900 |
| 6 | David Wyatt | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $1,458 |
| 7 | Jim Chakeres | Columbus, OH 43206 | $1,416 |
| 8 | Hal Haymaker | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,272 |
| 9 | Lowell Douce | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,235 |
| 10 | James Cunningham | Wshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160 | $1,210 |
| 11 | Frank Bowermaster | Sabina, OH 45169 | $1,181 |
| 12 | Philip L Grover | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,141 |
| 13 | Tracy Dendinger | Washington Ch, OH 43160 | $1,123 |
| 14 | Edwin Clark Mccoy | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $990 |
| 15 | Edwin C Mccoy Jr | New Holland, OH 43145 | $812 |
| 16 | Dan Schlichter | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $810 |
| 17 | Wayne E Arnold | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $801 |
| 18 | Beth M Wilson | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $753 |
| 19 | Monica Wood | Sabina, OH 45169 | $724 |
| 20 | Dianna Wyatt | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf