Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 703

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $28,801,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2020
1Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,935,283
2Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,404,518
3Meerland Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,028,388
4Twin Oak Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$656,559
5Holland Pyke LLCWashington Ch, OH 43160$542,977
6Mount Sterling Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$516,407
7Straathof Swine LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$485,175
8Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$394,904
9John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$362,037
10Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$339,636
11Schaefer Family Farms LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$313,314
12Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$283,924
13Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$281,001
14Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$264,474
15Bonham Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$263,610
16Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$251,765
17Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$244,172
18Dill Family Farms IncSabina, OH 45169$241,885
19Daniel R RobinsonMount Sterling, OH 43143$222,698
20Andrew Thomas BeattyGreenfield, OH 45123$221,644

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag