Conservation Reserve Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 701

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $30,317,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
1Conn Farms IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$579,693
2John R BryanNew Holland, OH 43145$474,762
3Julie Bryan GarringerClarksburg, OH 43115$474,760
4David BihlWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$471,878
5Randy HughesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$381,898
6Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$374,044
7James BeattyAngwin, CA 94508$345,300
8Jerry N HoppesGreenfield, OH 45123$329,548
9Arrow Farms LtdNew Holland, OH 43145$291,147
10Steven J GuessNew Holland, OH 43145$288,526
11Marilyn I FanninJeffersonville, OH 43128$286,962
12Jeffrey Dan JacksonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$284,284
13Davis Family Farms Limited PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$279,691
14Robert J HainesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$273,928
15Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$272,900
16Broken Arrow Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$267,485
17Kenneth W KirkNew Holland, OH 43145$259,851
18Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$256,832
19Clifford D RoyseGreenfield, OH 45123$244,108
20James A PaisleyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$242,738

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag