Total Commodity Programs in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,641

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $196,457,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$7,190,919
2Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$3,961,995
3Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,508,698
4Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$2,212,219
5Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,084,722
6John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,984,601
7Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,760,735
8Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$1,695,430
9Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,597,615
10Martin Land CoJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,452,704
11Meerland Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,452,555
12David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$1,447,128
13Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,439,921
14Gary Ward CockerillLeesburg, OH 45135$1,355,461
15Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,340,737
16Larry CarmanWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,268,567
17Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,243,101
18Ted William WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,237,091
19Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,234,754
20Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,234,500

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag