Conservation Reserve Program in Marion County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 460
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Marion County, Ohio totaled $2,318,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lust Bros | Marion, OH 43302 | $65,956 |
2 | Gracely Bros | Marion, OH 43302 | $63,402 |
3 | Wyandot Farm Co Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $50,000 |
4 | Margaret Burley - Burley Farms LLC | Prospect, OH 43342 | $49,999 |
5 | Cancro Limited Partnership | New Bloomington, OH 43341 | $49,997 |
6 | Lust Acres Inc | Marion, OH 43302 | $48,780 |
7 | William L Schwaderer | Marysville, OH 43040 | $45,158 |
8 | Thomas G Watkins - Thomas G Watkins Living Trust | Weaverville, NC 28787 | $40,769 |
9 | David L Wright | La Rue, OH 43332 | $39,601 |
10 | Jeffery T Mallett | La Rue, OH 43332 | $38,952 |
11 | Teresia L Mallett | La Rue, OH 43332 | $38,952 |
12 | Ag-credit Aca ** | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $38,435 |
13 | Theodore - Theodorew & Maryd Unsicker Tr W Unsicke | Coldwater, MI 49036 | $37,209 |
14 | Gracely Farms Inc | Marion, OH 43302 | $36,207 |
15 | Everett Farm LLC | La Rue, OH 43332 | $34,328 |
16 | Robert Imbody Jr | La Rue, OH 43332 | $34,295 |
17 | Jean Dreyer | Marion, OH 43301 | $33,781 |
18 | J H Johnson Farms Inc | La Rue, OH 43332 | $30,476 |
19 | Michael E Brewer | Marion, OH 43302 | $30,042 |
20 | Mary Ellen Withrow - Withrow Family Trust | Marion, OH 43302 | $29,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>