Total Conservation Programs in Ottawa County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 334
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $805,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jim And Kate Smith Family LLC | Newport, KY 41071 | $41,062 |
| 2 | Lockwood Road Properties LLC | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $17,678 |
| 3 | Geo O Trenchard Jr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $17,223 |
| 4 | Benny C Petersen | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $16,947 |
| 5 | Danbury Heights Partners | Marblehead, OH 43440 | $16,894 |
| 6 | John F Gradel & Sons Farms Inc | Toledo, OH 43605 | $14,295 |
| 7 | Brad V Murray | Lakeside Marblehead, OH 43440 | $14,184 |
| 8 | Craig Carr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $13,688 |
| 9 | Leroy Hall | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $12,994 |
| 10 | Mark Witt | Elmore, OH 43416 | $11,727 |
| 11 | Paul Gonya | Fremont, OH 43420 | $11,696 |
| 12 | Alan Diefenthaler | Martin, OH 43445 | $11,300 |
| 13 | Lee A Henry | Graytown, OH 43432 | $11,111 |
| 14 | Karen R Henry | Graytown, OH 43432 | $11,111 |
| 15 | Luann Monak | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $9,982 |
| 16 | Kevin Soncrant | Curtice, OH 43412 | $9,904 |
| 17 | Jean A Shetenhelm | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $9,441 |
| 18 | Sweeney Marsh Inc | Fremont, OH 43420 | $8,812 |
| 19 | Lois Rae Harder | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,681 |
| 20 | Jeff Kuras | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $8,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf