Total Commodity Programs in Shelby County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,471
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Shelby County, Ohio totaled $175,958,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Seger Farms Inc | Sidney, OH 45365 | $2,999,421 |
2 | Robert L Barhorst | Anna, OH 45302 | $2,233,340 |
3 | David L Mann | Jackson Center, OH 45334 | $1,945,630 |
4 | Huelskamp & Sons Inc | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,864,374 |
5 | Verdier Farms | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,451,980 |
6 | James Lehmkuhl | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,409,931 |
7 | Everett Farms Inc | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,383,587 |
8 | Bernard L Brautigam | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,336,803 |
9 | Wehrland Farms Inc | Anna, OH 45302 | $1,301,061 |
10 | Lehmkuhl Farms LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $1,295,513 |
11 | Berning Bros III, LLC | Anna, OH 45302 | $1,253,542 |
12 | Bensman Enterprises | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,237,566 |
13 | Schafer Dairy Farms Inc | Russia, OH 45363 | $1,189,192 |
14 | Thomas J Finkenbine | Maplewood, OH 45340 | $1,148,079 |
15 | Mitchell M Brautigam | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,127,561 |
16 | Covault Farms Inc | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,111,423 |
17 | Richard E Huelskamp | Sidney, OH 45365 | $1,111,261 |
18 | Wells Family Farms Ltd LLC | Anna, OH 45302 | $1,011,607 |
19 | Triple M Farms Inc | Sidney, OH 45365 | $962,222 |
20 | Mark Hageman | Sidney, OH 45365 | $940,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>