Total Commodity Programs in Van Wert County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,988
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Van Wert County, Ohio totaled $195,392,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cbj Farms | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,951,963 |
2 | Triple L Farms Lmted Prtn | Ohio City, OH 45874 | $1,782,531 |
3 | Harting Farms LLC | Convoy, OH 45832 | $1,665,448 |
4 | L S L Farms Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,633,420 |
5 | Gina Dairy LLC | Ohio City, OH 45874 | $1,394,098 |
6 | David Poe Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,295,626 |
7 | Agracola Farms Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,276,180 |
8 | Marcarl Farms Inc | Convoy, OH 45832 | $1,211,399 |
9 | Lichtensteiger Farms | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,145,228 |
10 | Triple R Farms | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,097,060 |
11 | William E Dowler | Convoy, OH 45832 | $1,055,891 |
12 | Carey Davis & Sons Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,039,860 |
13 | Lehman Farms Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $1,034,437 |
14 | Terry D Fralick | Convoy, OH 45832 | $1,012,209 |
15 | David L Rees | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $994,983 |
16 | Mar-jan Farms Inc | Venedocia, OH 45894 | $984,663 |
17 | Profit & Sons Farms Inc | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $940,289 |
18 | Sawmiller Bros | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $882,644 |
19 | Dean Holdgreve | Delphos, OH 45833 | $872,544 |
20 | The Marsh Foundation | Van Wert, OH 45891 | $864,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>