Counter Cyclical Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 834
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $4,926,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio Family Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $177,410 |
2 | G & J Koehler Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $77,408 |
3 | K & K Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,696 |
4 | Rcj Sheaffer Partnership | Morral, OH 43337 | $57,304 |
5 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $56,384 |
6 | Reile And Co | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $54,235 |
7 | Gary Huffman | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $52,320 |
8 | Sheaffer Farms Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $49,743 |
9 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $49,300 |
10 | Herring Farms | Harpster, OH 43323 | $47,348 |
11 | Dean K Koehler | Nevada, OH 44849 | $43,920 |
12 | Carol S Koehler | Nevada, OH 44849 | $43,920 |
13 | Crabarkalee Farms Inc | Harpster, OH 43323 | $41,437 |
14 | Leslie Family Trust-james Leslie | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $41,027 |
15 | Ronald L Walters | Forest, OH 45843 | $38,677 |
16 | Darrel Walton Rev Trust | Placida, FL 33946 | $38,082 |
17 | William Warren Osborn | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $37,434 |
18 | Lyle Weaver | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $35,120 |
19 | Romanko Farms Inc | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $34,726 |
20 | Patricia Althouse Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $34,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>