Total Conservation Programs in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,207
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $30,371,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $625,732 |
2 | Craig Frisch | Forest, OH 45843 | $383,237 |
3 | John Clinger Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $359,196 |
4 | Van Orians | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $353,929 |
5 | David T Courtad | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $327,655 |
6 | Thiel Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $300,745 |
7 | Neil Bair | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $300,737 |
8 | Lee Bailey | Forest, OH 45843 | $279,042 |
9 | Emery Walton | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $274,158 |
10 | Daryl Ruehle Rev Trust | Mc Cutchenville, OH 44844 | $257,331 |
11 | Darrel Walton Rev Trust | Placida, FL 33946 | $251,457 |
12 | Hubert Sheaffer Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $226,629 |
13 | Mark Koehler | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $226,523 |
14 | Robert L Walter Sr Rev Trust | Forest, OH 45843 | $225,753 |
15 | Dallas Parsell | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $209,799 |
16 | David E Youngs | Forest, OH 45843 | $206,815 |
17 | A David Gottfried Living Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $204,049 |
18 | Joseph Musgrave | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $201,873 |
19 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $198,246 |
20 | James Stief | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $196,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>