Total Commodity Programs in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 493
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $12,359,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio Family Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $384,767 |
2 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $344,468 |
3 | Rcj Sheaffer Partnership | Morral, OH 43337 | $312,060 |
4 | Richards Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $262,914 |
5 | Sheaffer Farms Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $222,860 |
6 | Williams Pork Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $215,656 |
7 | Bils Family Farms Ltd | Nevada, OH 44849 | $187,779 |
8 | Ed Needs | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $185,426 |
9 | Hmw Agri Services Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $179,445 |
10 | David Fox | Forest, OH 45843 | $173,225 |
11 | Kevin Summit Rev Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $172,581 |
12 | Todd M Summit | Carey, OH 43316 | $171,461 |
13 | G & J Koehler Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $168,307 |
14 | Persistence Pork LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $166,650 |
15 | Auglaize Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $161,521 |
16 | Larry Ross Farm Account | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $141,670 |
17 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $140,099 |
18 | Matthew L Smalley Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $135,007 |
19 | Dean K Koehler | Nevada, OH 44849 | $132,861 |
20 | Carol S Koehler | Nevada, OH 44849 | $132,861 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>