Total Conservation Programs in Grady County, Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 186
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grady County, Oklahoma totaled $2,239,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gerald W Ast | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $25,751 |
22 | Keith Nease | Marlow, OK 73055 | $23,682 |
23 | Laverne Sumner | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $23,036 |
24 | Sumner Family Partnership Ltd | Chickasha, OK 73023 | $23,036 |
25 | Jack Jones Estate | Rush Springs, OK 73082 | $23,032 |
26 | Leland Boren | Upland, IN 46989 | $22,287 |
27 | Mark Dolch | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $22,050 |
28 | Edwards Family Trust | Chickasha, OK 73023 | $21,771 |
29 | Jamie R Howard | Chickasha, OK 73023 | $21,770 |
30 | Charles R Fowler | Mustang, OK 73064 | $21,251 |
31 | J G Gallup Construction | Stratford, OK 74872 | $19,740 |
32 | Samuel J Nicholas | Moore, OK 73160 | $19,577 |
33 | Bingham & Co | Chickasha, OK 73023 | $18,382 |
34 | Virginia L Toby Living Trust | Oklahoma City, OK 73179 | $17,818 |
35 | Greg E Brown | Marlow, OK 73055 | $17,770 |
36 | Joseph Gilbert Gallup | Stratford, OK 74872 | $17,587 |
37 | George Mcneff Jr | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $17,504 |
38 | Donnie Mcneff | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $17,498 |
39 | Dennis Mcneff | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $17,498 |
40 | Joe Mccomas Revocable Trust Dated 12/11/2000 | Minco, OK 73059 | $16,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”