Farm Subsidy information
Mayes County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Mayes County, Oklahoma, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 624
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mayes County, Oklahoma totaled $3,330,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles H And Ellen L Coblentz Dairy Farms Inc | Chouteau, OK 74337 | $208,266 |
2 | Drake Family Farms LLC | Pryor, OK 74361 | $100,558 |
3 | Courtney Brothers | Pryor, OK 74361 | $84,042 |
4 | James B Sackett | Hanna, OK 74845 | $71,107 |
5 | Michael L Armitage Dba A Bar Ranc | Claremore, OK 74018 | $56,374 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $50,890 |
7 | Covey Farms | Rose, OK 74364 | $41,522 |
8 | Wc Land LLC | Rose, OK 74364 | $35,059 |
9 | The Roger Preston And Or Renita Jo Moore 2006 Revo | Pryor, OK 74361 | $34,570 |
10 | Charles A Dorsey Jr | Pryor, OK 74361 | $34,211 |
11 | Gene Battiest | Colcord, OK 74338 | $32,505 |
12 | Betty Hamill | Adair, OK 74330 | $32,361 |
13 | Donald D Peper | Adair, OK 74330 | $31,581 |
14 | George M Peper Revocable Trust | Chelsea, OK 74016 | $31,580 |
15 | Ewald C Peper | Adair, OK 74330 | $31,525 |
16 | Dean Cherry | Vinita, OK 74301 | $29,150 |
17 | Herb Hammer II | Pryor, OK 74361 | $28,751 |
18 | Donald P Cates | Spavinaw, OK 74366 | $28,348 |
19 | Shane Allen Best | Strang, OK 74367 | $28,061 |
20 | Mad Ventures LLC | Adair, OK 74330 | $26,810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>