Farm Subsidy information
Baker County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Baker County, Oregon, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 234
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $4,249,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pickard Ranch LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $110,249 |
| 2 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $101,013 |
| 3 | Allen Farms Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $88,729 |
| 4 | Farm At Eagle Tree, Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $77,137 |
| 5 | Thomas Angus Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $75,083 |
| 6 | Phillips Cattle Co | Baker City, OR 97814 | $74,725 |
| 7 | Bloomer Ranches Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $71,798 |
| 8 | Phillips Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $71,157 |
| 9 | Harrell Hereford Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $61,693 |
| 10 | Timber Canyon Ranch LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $59,674 |
| 11 | Warnock Ranches Inc | Maupin, OR 97037 | $53,146 |
| 12 | Trenton L Siddoway | Bridgeport, OR 97819 | $50,108 |
| 13 | Lazy S Over 7 Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $49,896 |
| 14 | Gary Bloomer | Baker City, OR 97814 | $49,426 |
| 15 | Jared L Smull | Durkee, OR 97905 | $47,568 |
| 16 | Blatchford Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $45,119 |
| 17 | Dan L. Forsea & Sons Inc | Richland, OR 97870 | $43,751 |
| 18 | Jacobs Ranches, Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $43,640 |
| 19 | Rex D Nelson | Baker City, OR 97814 | $40,135 |
| 20 | Mike Hutton | Baker City, OR 97814 | $38,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf