Farm Subsidy information
Baker County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Baker County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,007
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $71,434,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $1,652,919 |
2 | Allen Farms Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $1,619,705 |
3 | Arm Ward Ranches | Baker City, OR 97814 | $1,528,730 |
4 | Bloomer Ranches Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $1,095,702 |
5 | Harrell Hereford Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $1,003,503 |
6 | Lazy S Over 7 Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $938,470 |
7 | Pickard Ranch LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $924,639 |
8 | Thomas Angus Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $886,311 |
9 | Gary Bloomer | Baker City, OR 97814 | $868,738 |
10 | Phillips Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $808,714 |
11 | Kerns Rainbow Ranch Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $797,872 |
12 | Timber Canyon Ranch LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $703,689 |
13 | Phillips Cattle Co | Baker City, OR 97814 | $654,665 |
14 | Blatchford Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $653,331 |
15 | Michael J Widman | Baker City, OR 97814 | $637,100 |
16 | Trenton L Siddoway | Bridgeport, OR 97819 | $626,379 |
17 | Oliver Wilde | Baker City, OR 97814 | $619,640 |
18 | Wilson Cattle Co Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $606,373 |
19 | Rainbow Bar Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $580,064 |
20 | Jacobs Ranch Inc. | Baker City, OR 97814 | $574,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>