Total Commodity Programs in Clackamas County, Oregon, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 155
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clackamas County, Oregon totaled $5,501,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montecucco Farms LLC | Canby, OR 97013 | $792,202 |
| 2 | J Frank Schmidt & Son Co | Boring, OR 97009 | $750,000 |
| 3 | Northwest Shade Trees LLC | Boring, OR 97009 | $296,693 |
| 4 | Staehely Valley Veue Dairy LLC | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $267,182 |
| 5 | John Holmlund Nursery LLC | Boring, OR 97009 | $250,000 |
| 6 | Eisele Farms Inc | Boring, OR 97009 | $250,000 |
| 7 | Hopper Bros LLC | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $184,161 |
| 8 | Coleman Corrals Inc | Molalla, OR 97038 | $183,792 |
| 9 | Hans Nelson And Sons Nursery Inc | Boring, OR 97009 | $161,032 |
| 10 | Rumpca Farms Inc | Canby, OR 97013 | $144,073 |
| 11 | David P Pyle | Lake Oswego, OR 97035 | $127,227 |
| 12 | Koch Legacy Farms Inc | Canby, OR 97013 | $113,316 |
| 13 | John F Perrin Jr | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $107,194 |
| 14 | David A Mcdonald | Canby, OR 97013 | $91,453 |
| 15 | Cloud-cap Farms LLC | Boring, OR 97009 | $87,274 |
| 16 | Island Mist Inc | Cascade Locks, OR 97014 | $84,247 |
| 17 | Simnitt Nursery LLC | Canby, OR 97013 | $82,052 |
| 18 | Cascade Berries LLC | Wilsonville, OR 97070 | $74,757 |
| 19 | Pacer Fisheries LLC | Lake Oswego, OR 97035 | $66,023 |
| 20 | Bristol Five Inc | Cascade Locks, OR 97014 | $54,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf