Total Conservation Programs in Grant County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 200
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grant County, Oregon totaled $7,877,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confederated Tribes Of Warm Springs | Warm Springs, OR 97761 | $1,150,379 |
| 2 | Burns Paiute Tribe | Burns, OR 97720 | $650,850 |
| 3 | William L Miller | Madras, OR 97741 | $395,860 |
| 4 | Allan Mullin | John Day, OR 97845 | $298,618 |
| 5 | Louis L Coelho | Long Creek, OR 97856 | $295,651 |
| 6 | R Scott Knox | Wedderburn, OR 97491 | $273,227 |
| 7 | Lazy H Land & Cattle Co Inc | Hayden, ID 83835 | $272,843 |
| 8 | R M Knox & Son's Inc | Wedderburn, OR 97491 | $237,322 |
| 9 | Darrel Holliday Ranch Inc | John Day, OR 97845 | $235,250 |
| 10 | Erik M Nansen | Monument, OR 97864 | $230,235 |
| 11 | James M Dovenberg | West Linn, OR 97068 | $227,110 |
| 12 | Norbert Smith | Newberg, OR 97132 | $222,890 |
| 13 | China Peak Ranch | Rathdrum, ID 83858 | $207,670 |
| 14 | Campbell Crossing Inc | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $185,885 |
| 15 | Ron Burnette | Ritter, OR 97856 | $177,757 |
| 16 | Holliday Land & Livestock Inc | John Day, OR 97845 | $121,967 |
| 17 | Southworth Bros Inc | Seneca, OR 97873 | $117,484 |
| 18 | Philip Henry Kuhl | John Day, OR 97845 | $111,049 |
| 19 | Keerins Ranch | Canyon City, OR 97820 | $107,691 |
| 20 | Kurt M. Spencer | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $106,783 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf