Farm Subsidy information
Lane County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Lane County, Oregon, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 235
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lane County, Oregon totaled $6,507,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Konyn Dairy LLC | Eugene, OR 97408 | $565,003 |
| 2 | Lochmead Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $526,667 |
| 3 | Beef Steak Ranch-cm Inc | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $413,941 |
| 4 | Paul W Massey | Junction City, OR 97448 | $388,238 |
| 5 | Miller Penfold Cattle | Eugene, OR 97405 | $379,446 |
| 6 | Thistledown Farm Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $282,938 |
| 7 | Harrolds Dairy LLC | Creswell, OR 97426 | $254,688 |
| 8 | Harper Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $185,324 |
| 9 | Ben B Kokkeler | Junction City, OR 97448 | $169,445 |
| 10 | Lehman Dairy II Inc | Eugene, OR 97402 | $140,470 |
| 11 | Hawley Land & Cattle LLC | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $140,045 |
| 12 | Donald E Hansen | Creswell, OR 97426 | $137,028 |
| 13 | Nahanni Fisheries, Inc | Eugene, OR 97401 | $130,234 |
| 14 | Goodpasture Farms LLC | Vida, OR 97488 | $114,130 |
| 15 | Rice Farms LLC | Eugene, OR 97408 | $105,259 |
| 16 | Ruddell Farms LLC | Junction City, OR 97448 | $83,828 |
| 17 | Cody M Wood | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $77,808 |
| 18 | Reerslev Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $75,306 |
| 19 | Peter Gutoski | Eugene, OR 97408 | $73,800 |
| 20 | Winter Green LLC | Noti, OR 97461 | $68,992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf