Farm Subsidy information
Lane County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Lane County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 855
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lane County, Oregon totaled $24,825,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Konyn Dairy LLC | Eugene, OR 97408 | $1,223,285 |
| 2 | Harrolds Dairy LLC | Creswell, OR 97426 | $732,809 |
| 3 | Lochmead Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $718,570 |
| 4 | Reerslev Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $706,746 |
| 5 | Harper Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $650,181 |
| 6 | Paul W Massey | Junction City, OR 97448 | $545,143 |
| 7 | Miller Penfold Cattle | Eugene, OR 97405 | $496,829 |
| 8 | Lehman Dairy II Inc | Eugene, OR 97402 | $481,675 |
| 9 | H-c Farms Inc | Creswell, OR 97426 | $419,385 |
| 10 | Beef Steak Ranch-cm Inc | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $413,941 |
| 11 | Cersovski Farms LLC | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $383,509 |
| 12 | Seneca Sawmill Company | Eugene, OR 97440 | $382,795 |
| 13 | Swanson Group Mfg LLC | Glendale, OR 97442 | $336,904 |
| 14 | Thistledown Farm Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $327,407 |
| 15 | Hayworth Farms Inc | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $290,992 |
| 16 | Gerald W Detering Co Inc | Harrisburg, OR 97446 | $287,261 |
| 17 | Louis L Kokkeler | Junction City, OR 97448 | $287,241 |
| 18 | Donald E Hansen | Creswell, OR 97426 | $286,264 |
| 19 | Dick Falk | Junction City, OR 97448 | $260,035 |
| 20 | Johnson Ranch Co Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $251,251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf