Total Disaster Programs in Pennsylvania, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 565
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $10,980,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sauder Eggs, LLC | Lititz, PA 17543 | $405,352 |
| 2 | Brian Campbell Farms | Berwick, PA 18603 | $250,000 |
| 3 | Young Apiaries Inc | Cogan Station, PA 17728 | $224,522 |
| 4 | David C Jones | Cabot, PA 16023 | $204,426 |
| 5 | Dries Orchards Inc | Paxinos, PA 17860 | $187,500 |
| 6 | Jay M Lehman | Manheim, PA 17545 | $146,066 |
| 7 | Bradley T Wilson | Volant, PA 16156 | $125,000 |
| 8 | Sernak Farms Inc | Weatherly, PA 18255 | $114,451 |
| 9 | R & L Orchard Co | Gardners, PA 17324 | $110,520 |
| 10 | Huff's Honey Farm LLC | Trout Run, PA 17771 | $98,843 |
| 11 | Aqua Life Inc | Richland, PA 17087 | $98,536 |
| 12 | Irishtown Acres | Grove City, PA 16127 | $97,042 |
| 13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $96,421 |
| 14 | Pilgram Farms, LLC | Fredonia, PA 16124 | $89,182 |
| 15 | Toth Family Farm LLC | Grove City, PA 16127 | $84,633 |
| 16 | David E And David R Hackenberg, Hackenberg Apiarie | Lewisburg, PA 17837 | $79,275 |
| 17 | Well Bred Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant Mills, PA 17853 | $78,775 |
| 18 | Yahner Brothers Farms | Patton, PA 16668 | $78,448 |
| 19 | Clayholm Farms LLC | Worthington, PA 16262 | $69,453 |
| 20 | Smiths Incredibull Farms | North Washington, PA 16048 | $68,330 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf