Farm Subsidy information
Chester County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Chester County, Pennsylvania, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 228
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chester County, Pennsylvania totaled $4,710,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beam Farms Inc | Elverson, PA 19520 | $270,959 |
2 | Wilkinson Farms Inc | Landenberg, PA 19350 | $251,374 |
3 | Walton Farms LLC | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $168,986 |
4 | Hicks Brothers LLC | Kennett Square, PA 19348 | $148,331 |
5 | Walmoore Holsteins Inc | West Grove, PA 19390 | $137,445 |
6 | Locust Lane Farms LLC | Atglen, PA 19310 | $134,260 |
7 | Smoker Farm LLC | Parkesburg, PA 19365 | $118,518 |
8 | Richard And Alicia Schlosberg | Thornton, PA 19373 | $118,215 |
9 | Donald W Cairns | Parkesburg, PA 19365 | $105,273 |
10 | Lapp Farms LLC | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $103,699 |
11 | Silver Maple Family Farms, LLC | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $100,338 |
12 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $99,080 |
13 | Mason's Chrome View Limited | Nottingham, PA 19362 | $88,627 |
14 | Arjoy Farms LLC | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $70,963 |
15 | Nolan L King | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $59,915 |
16 | Breck-a-de Farm | Oxford, PA 19363 | $59,312 |
17 | Robert E Rohrer | Nottingham, PA 19362 | $58,892 |
18 | Ryan E Rohrer | Nottingham, PA 19362 | $58,688 |
19 | Conrad D King | Atglen, PA 19310 | $54,159 |
20 | Neal B King | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $50,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>