Emergency Conservation Program in South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $3,106,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gamble Family Farms | New Zion, SC 29111 | $270,814 |
| 2 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $221,769 |
| 3 | T S Lee & Sons Inc | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $200,000 |
| 4 | James V Mcclain | North, SC 29112 | $200,000 |
| 5 | Jnl Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $200,000 |
| 6 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $187,072 |
| 7 | Cannon Ag Products LLC | Turbeville, SC 29162 | $166,716 |
| 8 | Two Tel Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $136,465 |
| 9 | Witherspoon Farms LLC | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $124,806 |
| 10 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $120,366 |
| 11 | Flowers Farms LLC | Summerton, SC 29148 | $113,414 |
| 12 | Cogdill Family Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $110,000 |
| 13 | John E Johnson III | New Zion, SC 29111 | $101,498 |
| 14 | James Houston Hicks | New Zion, SC 29111 | $67,074 |
| 15 | Bentwood Farms LLC | Monroe, NC 28110 | $65,472 |
| 16 | B & D Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $64,794 |
| 17 | James A. Hicks | New Zion, SC 29111 | $58,400 |
| 18 | Beard Farms, LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $57,847 |
| 19 | Dubose Landscape Designs | Manning, SC 29102 | $57,437 |
| 20 | Brogdon Family Farms | Manning, SC 29102 | $40,768 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf