Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,083

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $77,719,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
21Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$319,707
22Haigler Farms PartnershipCameron, SC 29030$319,199
23W T Brogdon Jr Farms Brogdon FarmsSumter, SC 29153$315,555
24Lee NewmanSumter, SC 29153$314,002
25Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$313,361
26Sharp And Sharp Certified Seed Dba Sharp And SharpAllendale, SC 29810$308,968
27Simpson Family FarmsMonroe, NC 28110$302,943
28C & S Farms LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$302,489
29Gonzales' Land & Timber LLCColumbia, SC 29201$275,356
30Riley FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$270,201
31Mcintosh BrothersPinewood, SC 29125$262,771
32Betty Allen FarmsLatta, SC 29565$247,382
33Russell Farms PartHolly Hill, SC 29059$239,085
34B & D Farms LLCManning, SC 29102$236,439
35Cotton Lane FarmsElloree, SC 29047$233,352
36Bentwood Farms LLCMonroe, NC 28110$218,881
37Ted Shuler & SonsSantee, SC 29142$215,229
38Jameson FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$212,811
39Gamble Family FarmsNew Zion, SC 29111$208,493
40A L Felder Farms IncBowman, SC 29018$207,767

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag