Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,083

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $77,719,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$1,965,148
2Connelly FarmsUlmer, SC 29849$986,621
3Jjj FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$578,461
4Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$515,691
5Ag South Farm Credit Aca **Douglas, GA 31534$452,382
6H E & J B Shuler & SonsHolly Hill, SC 29059$437,009
7Tolson FarmsLynchburg, SC 29080$434,455
8Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$423,793
9L & S FarmsSummerton, SC 29148$406,647
10Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$392,949
11J-ray Farms Of South Carolina General PartnershipMayesville, SC 29104$373,974
12Dantzler Farms PartSantee, SC 29142$372,332
13Brogdon Family FarmsManning, SC 29102$372,201
14Infinger Farms PartnershipSaint George, SC 29477$371,532
15Chappell PartnershipBarnwell, SC 29812$365,804
16Oak III FarmsSummerton, SC 29148$362,312
17Jco FarmsAllendale, SC 29810$360,688
18Kelley Farms PartnershipOlanta, SC 29114$352,520
19Four J Family FarmsPinewood, SC 29125$351,351
20Double D FarmsGable, SC 29051$327,004

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag