Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,732
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in South Carolina totaled $171,620,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $6,113,089 |
2 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $6,112,330 |
3 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,493,434 |
4 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $1,818,030 |
5 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $1,750,523 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,464,124 |
7 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $1,414,110 |
8 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,358,495 |
9 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,349,428 |
10 | Palmetto Farms | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $1,332,438 |
11 | Cotton Lane Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,315,597 |
12 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $1,258,891 |
13 | Enterprise Bank Of Sc ** | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $1,256,506 |
14 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $1,211,622 |
15 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $1,179,573 |
16 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $1,099,662 |
17 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $983,340 |
18 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $979,426 |
19 | Crider Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $967,547 |
20 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $918,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>