Farm Subsidy information
Allendale County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Allendale County, South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 100
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Allendale County, South Carolina totaled $3,515,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $630,735 |
2 | Chappell Partnership | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $333,984 |
3 | Sharp And Sharp Certified Seed Dba Sharp And Sharp | Allendale, SC 29810 | $286,378 |
4 | Jco Farms | Allendale, SC 29810 | $191,399 |
5 | Farmers Grain & Supply Inc | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $146,067 |
6 | Jerry M Cone Sr | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $144,234 |
7 | James B Duncan | Martin, SC 29836 | $137,665 |
8 | Chappell Brothers Farm | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $114,886 |
9 | Richard R Williams Sr | Sycamore, SC 29846 | $76,469 |
10 | T & M Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $76,241 |
11 | Russell Barker | Allendale, SC 29810 | $60,544 |
12 | Richard R Williams Jr | Sycamore, SC 29846 | $47,475 |
13 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $44,733 |
14 | Jerry Michael Cone Jr | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $39,507 |
15 | George A Handberry Jr | Martin, SC 29836 | $38,112 |
16 | Low Country Planting LLC | Allendale, SC 29810 | $26,878 |
17 | Sanders Family Trust | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $22,267 |
18 | George B Sanders | Farifax, SC 29827 | $22,267 |
19 | Daniel Bessinger | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $22,033 |
20 | J & J Farms Of Estill Sc,inc | Estill, SC 29918 | $18,711 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>