Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,094
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $153,736,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $9,625,058 |
| 2 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $5,878,620 |
| 3 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $5,680,549 |
| 4 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $5,032,027 |
| 5 | Palmetto Farms | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $4,660,917 |
| 6 | Bates Houck Farm | Cameron, SC 29030 | $3,424,544 |
| 7 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $3,066,757 |
| 8 | Harry L Ott Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,946,968 |
| 9 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $2,828,233 |
| 10 | William C Holman Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,663,198 |
| 11 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $2,165,800 |
| 12 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,983,229 |
| 13 | Oak Lane Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,962,855 |
| 14 | Delbert C Inabinet | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $1,918,323 |
| 15 | Bickley Farms Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,838,327 |
| 16 | Hayne Haigler & Sons | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,714,771 |
| 17 | John Olson III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,555,880 |
| 18 | Rawl Dargan Culclasure III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,514,814 |
| 19 | Knowlton R Stabler | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,463,177 |
| 20 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $1,446,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf