Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,094
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $153,736,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jesse D Shirer III | Lone Star, SC 29030 | $1,316,484 |
22 | Michael P Shirer | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,299,197 |
23 | Mark Ott | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,245,795 |
24 | John W Hane | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $1,233,126 |
25 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,231,020 |
26 | Lang Syne Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,168,553 |
27 | John H Inabinet Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $1,163,827 |
28 | James D Rast Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,133,604 |
29 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $1,104,532 |
30 | Carson Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,083,119 |
31 | Jeff Reeves | Elloree, SC 29047 | $1,046,672 |
32 | Longstreet Farms Inc | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $1,045,416 |
33 | William J Spiers Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,031,521 |
34 | J Cecil Moore Jr | North, SC 29112 | $1,003,641 |
35 | Reed & Sons Farms LLC | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $996,692 |
36 | William M Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $950,521 |
37 | William M Shirer III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $944,735 |
38 | James M Sikes Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $921,754 |
39 | Curtis Russell Dukes | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $855,749 |
40 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $793,437 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”