Farm Subsidy information

Calhoun County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,094

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $153,736,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
21Jesse D Shirer IIILone Star, SC 29030$1,316,484
22Michael P ShirerCameron, SC 29030$1,299,197
23Mark OttSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,245,795
24John W HaneFort Motte, SC 29135$1,233,126
25John Steven WilesElloree, SC 29047$1,231,020
26Lang Syne FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,168,553
27John H Inabinet FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,163,827
28James D Rast JrCameron, SC 29030$1,133,604
29Jeffrey Legree KaiglerSwansea, SC 29160$1,104,532
30Carson FarmsElloree, SC 29047$1,083,119
31Jeff ReevesElloree, SC 29047$1,046,672
32Longstreet Farms IncSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,045,416
33William J Spiers JrCameron, SC 29030$1,031,521
34J Cecil Moore JrNorth, SC 29112$1,003,641
35Reed & Sons Farms LLCSt Matthews, SC 29135$996,692
36William M Shirer JrCameron, SC 29030$950,521
37William M Shirer IIICameron, SC 29030$944,735
38James M Sikes JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$921,754
39Curtis Russell DukesSt Matthews, SC 29135$855,749
40William H Bull JrCameron, SC 29030$793,437

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag