Farm Subsidy information
Charleston County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Charleston County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 218
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Charleston County, South Carolina totaled $8,299,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Freeman Farms Oliver W Freeman | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $681,139 |
| 2 | Joseph Fields | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $365,635 |
| 3 | Green Meadow Nursery LLC | Hollywood, SC 29449 | $250,000 |
| 4 | King Brothers | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $243,069 |
| 5 | Charleston Vegetable Company LLC | Stockton, MD 21864 | $219,267 |
| 6 | Lowcountry Produce Of Charleston | Charleston, SC 29412 | $198,301 |
| 7 | Legare Farms Inc | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $180,526 |
| 8 | Island Fresh Seafood | Meggett, SC 29449 | $164,674 |
| 9 | Barrier Island Oyster Company LLC | Charleston, SC 29412 | $151,594 |
| 10 | Robert Brown | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $136,462 |
| 11 | Rabbit Pt Farms Inc | Charleston, SC 29407 | $122,322 |
| 12 | Tony C Garvin | Adams Run, SC 29426 | $112,659 |
| 13 | Too Goo Doo Farms, Inc. | Meggett, SC 29449 | $111,324 |
| 14 | Jehossee Farms LLC | Charleston, SC 29401 | $104,696 |
| 15 | Edisto Seafarms, Inc | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $100,000 |
| 16 | Gyrdel Jerome Green | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $75,259 |
| 17 | Rabbit Pt Farms Inc | Charleston, SC 29407 | $73,140 |
| 18 | Garland Construction Company | Robbinsville, NC 28771 | $72,515 |
| 19 | Marshall S Ambrose | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $71,810 |
| 20 | Robert Fields Jr | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $69,241 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf