Total Commodity Programs in Charleston County, South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 137

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Charleston County, South Carolina totaled $1,700,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Green Meadow Nursery LLCHollywood, SC 29449$250,000
2Lowcountry Produce Of CharlestonCharleston, SC 29412$198,301
3Viviane M LefebvreEdisto Island, SC 29438$48,069
4Joseph FieldsJohns Island, SC 29455$45,650
5Gonzales' Land & Timber LLCColumbia, SC 29201$38,935
6John R WhittemoreEdisto Island, SC 29438$36,934
7John B WalpoleWadmalaw Island, SC 29487$36,866
8Jeffrey M SpahrMc Clellanville, SC 29458$36,233
9Osgood D Hamlin JrMt Pleasant, SC 29466$34,303
10Barrier Island Oyster Company LLCCharleston, SC 29412$24,658
11W E Walpole Farms LLCWadmalaw Island, SC 29487$22,988
12Sunnyside Farms IncJohns Island, SC 29455$19,790
13Jason SchleizerHanahan, SC 29410$19,665
14Donald BrownMt Pleasant, SC 29464$19,519
15Phuoc TangNorth Charleston, SC 29406$17,973
16C A Magwood Jr Enterprises IncMt Pleasant, SC 29464$17,522
17Keith M SwindellMc Clellanville, SC 29458$16,809
18Sylvan Racine JrMc Clellanville, SC 29458$16,649
19Legare Farms IncJohns Island, SC 29455$16,475
20Bulls Bay EnterprisesMc Clellanville, SC 29458$16,468

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag