Total Commodity Programs in Darlington County, South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,388

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $113,816,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$7,633,446
2Doyle W OnealDarlington, SC 29540$2,974,434
3Robert T WindhamLamar, SC 29069$2,930,941
4Galloway FarmsDarlington, SC 29532$2,679,085
5J L Norwood JrDarlington, SC 29532$2,664,477
6Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$2,641,702
7Woodard Farms IncDarlington, SC 29540$2,585,599
8Oneal FarmsSociety Hill, SC 29593$2,444,134
9Richard A GallowayDarlington, SC 29532$2,357,936
10Thomas G ChaplinHartsville, SC 29550$2,343,885
11Lawson FarmsDarlington, SC 29540$2,338,971
12C Kelly WindhamLamar, SC 29069$2,242,042
13Dorla LewisDarlington, SC 29540$2,001,332
14Cecil T JamesDarlington, SC 29540$1,779,010
15J Robert Griggs Sr.Hartsville, SC 29550$1,705,812
16W W Kirven IIIDarlington, SC 29540$1,682,658
17Dargan Farms PartnershipDarlington, SC 29540$1,544,356
18Franklin R GleasonDarlington, SC 29540$1,520,476
19Johnny F RossDarlington, SC 29540$1,434,085
20James N Chapman Farms LLCHartsville, SC 29550$1,386,539

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag