Farm Subsidy information
Dillon County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Dillon County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 258
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dillon County, South Carolina totaled $9,649,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $956,630 |
| 2 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $796,586 |
| 3 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $586,296 |
| 4 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $297,808 |
| 5 | Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $222,730 |
| 6 | Bryant Farms Inc | Dillon, SC 29536 | $186,644 |
| 7 | Little Pee Dee Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $170,293 |
| 8 | Michael K Reaves | Hamer, SC 29547 | $153,211 |
| 9 | Floyd Johnson Jr | Latta, SC 29565 | $142,280 |
| 10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $137,013 |
| 11 | First Citizens Bank ** | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $134,905 |
| 12 | Daniel Joyner Nance | Lake View, SC 29563 | $124,773 |
| 13 | D L Coleman & Son Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $120,679 |
| 14 | Robert Smith Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $106,599 |
| 15 | John M Gasque Jr | Dillon, SC 29536 | $106,363 |
| 16 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $96,938 |
| 17 | John M Gasque | Dillon, SC 29536 | $95,722 |
| 18 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $88,017 |
| 19 | Eric S Gasque | Dillon, SC 29536 | $84,437 |
| 20 | Justin Lee Price | Dillon, SC 29536 | $82,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf