Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 179
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $3,059,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $486,765 |
2 | Cotton Lane Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $203,783 |
3 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $137,227 |
4 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $115,616 |
5 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $94,427 |
6 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $84,779 |
7 | Alva W Dannelly Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $81,731 |
8 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $77,892 |
9 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $74,528 |
10 | Willshire Farms Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $71,050 |
11 | Walker Bros. Farm, LLC | Norway, SC 29113 | $69,378 |
12 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $66,097 |
13 | Circle W Farm | Bowman, SC 29018 | $60,870 |
14 | Traywick And Son Farm | Cope, SC 29038 | $60,633 |
15 | Hugo L Felkel Farm Estate | Elloree, SC 29047 | $55,574 |
16 | Triple G Farms LLC | Cope, SC 29038 | $52,504 |
17 | Sublett Adolph Mcalhany Jr | Branchville, SC 29432 | $50,617 |
18 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $48,978 |
19 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $46,284 |
20 | Kathryn Nixon Rast | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $46,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>