Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37,878
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $2,023,000,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $5,343,764 |
2 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $2,484,932 |
3 | Yackley Ranches | Onida, SD 57564 | $1,921,440 |
4 | Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren Inc | Tabor, SD 57063 | $1,711,343 |
5 | Mayclin Farms Partnership | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,704,458 |
6 | Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren Inc | Forbes, ND 58439 | $1,678,324 |
7 | Rockport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $1,665,721 |
8 | Wagner Farms | Miller, SD 57362 | $1,651,582 |
9 | Gracevale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Winfred, SD 57076 | $1,628,179 |
10 | Shamrock Hutterian Brethren Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $1,620,943 |
11 | Upland Htt Breth Inc | Artesian, SD 57314 | $1,617,626 |
12 | Modak Dairy Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $1,604,954 |
13 | Hutterville South Dakota Inc | Stratford, SD 57474 | $1,603,077 |
14 | Oaklane Hutterian Brethren | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $1,581,414 |
15 | Hammink Dairy LLC | Bruce, SD 57220 | $1,571,140 |
16 | Huron Hutterian Brethren Inc | Huron, SD 57350 | $1,564,876 |
17 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,554,803 |
18 | Shannon Hutterian Brethren | Winfred, SD 57076 | $1,543,130 |
19 | Collins Hutterian Brethren Inc | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,537,744 |
20 | Lakeview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,536,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>