Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 23,896
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $962,244,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $681,215 |
| 22 | Lakeview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $677,269 |
| 23 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $676,350 |
| 24 | Pugh Bros | Miller, SD 57362 | $674,439 |
| 25 | Noethlich Bros | Doland, SD 57436 | $674,419 |
| 26 | M & T Schanzenbach Farms | Wetonka, SD 57481 | $661,855 |
| 27 | New Elm Spring Hutterian Brethren | Ethan, SD 57334 | $660,373 |
| 28 | Rolland Hutterian Brethren Inc | White, SD 57276 | $653,955 |
| 29 | First Dakota National Bank ** | Blunt, SD 57522 | $644,049 |
| 30 | Collins Hutterian Brethren Inc | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $642,821 |
| 31 | Shiloh Partnership | Andover, SD 57422 | $640,096 |
| 32 | Greenwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $634,538 |
| 33 | Jerome Mack Farms LLC | Leola, SD 57456 | $633,088 |
| 34 | Shamrock Hutterian Brethren Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $630,129 |
| 35 | Deiter Farms | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $623,440 |
| 36 | Geraets Brothers | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $622,776 |
| 37 | Edinger Brothers Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $621,704 |
| 38 | Evergreen Colony | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $612,737 |
| 39 | Rockport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $597,972 |
| 40 | Rosedale Hutterian Brethren Incor | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $596,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf