Total Commodity Programs in South Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 25,054
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Dakota totaled $572,717,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thunderbird Hutterian Brethren, Inc | Wecota, SD 57438 | $537,598 |
22 | Robert And Kari Salverson Joint Venture | Mound City, SD 57646 | $537,175 |
23 | Pbp Farms | Hurley, SD 57036 | $518,581 |
24 | Upland Htt Breth Inc | Artesian, SD 57314 | $513,846 |
25 | Pembrook Hutt Brethren | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $502,296 |
26 | Roe Farms Jtv | Harrold, SD 57536 | $496,973 |
27 | Oaklane Hutterian Brethren | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $480,721 |
28 | Klt Farms LLC | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $467,078 |
29 | Greenwood Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $465,140 |
30 | Heine Partnership | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $460,973 |
31 | Jes Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $460,327 |
32 | Vogel Farm | Akaska, SD 57420 | $460,159 |
33 | Schlechter Farms | Orient, SD 57467 | $457,179 |
34 | Deerfield Hutt Bret Inc | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $452,203 |
35 | Glendale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $444,393 |
36 | Malsam Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $440,476 |
37 | Olinger Farms Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $439,512 |
38 | Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren Inc | Tabor, SD 57063 | $436,175 |
39 | Locken Farms | Bath, SD 57427 | $427,816 |
40 | Deiter Farms | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $423,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”