Total Commodity Programs in South Dakota, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31,102

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Dakota totaled $1,442,000,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$5,308,888
2Lindskov Ranch Gen PtrIsabel, SD 57633$2,273,568
3Yackley RanchesOnida, SD 57564$1,919,770
4Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren IncTabor, SD 57063$1,710,537
5Mayclin Farms PartnershipPlankinton, SD 57368$1,698,110
6Rockport Hutterian Brethren IncAlexandria, SD 57311$1,665,721
7Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren IncForbes, ND 58439$1,662,718
8Wagner FarmsMiller, SD 57362$1,651,582
9Shamrock Hutterian Brethren IncCarpenter, SD 57322$1,620,403
10Upland Htt Breth IncArtesian, SD 57314$1,617,626
11Modak Dairy IncGoodwin, SD 57238$1,604,953
12Hutterville South Dakota IncStratford, SD 57474$1,597,468
13Oaklane Hutterian BrethrenAlexandria, SD 57311$1,581,409
14Huron Hutterian Brethren IncHuron, SD 57350$1,564,048
15Cedar Grove Hutt Breth IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,546,674
16Shannon Hutterian BrethrenWinfred, SD 57076$1,541,268
17Hammink Dairy LLCBruce, SD 57220$1,519,825
18Three B Farms PartnershipGettysburg, SD 57442$1,510,652
19Cowan Ranch PartnershipHighmore, SD 57345$1,501,731
20Gracevale Hutterian Brethren IncWinfred, SD 57076$1,500,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education