Farm Subsidy information

Aurora County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,628

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $283,133,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Mayclin Farms PartnershipPlankinton, SD 57368$7,105,137
2Edinger Brothers PartnershipMitchell, SD 57301$2,130,854
3Randy BormannStickney, SD 57375$1,544,467
4Wayne Robert KleinSioux Falls, SD 57108$1,496,141
5Curtis Leo GillenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,427,441
6Dennis Marlin AshwillPlankinton, SD 57368$1,398,721
7Ronald L GlissendorfWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,365,150
8Production PlusWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,357,129
9Van Dusseldorp Ag EnterprisesPlatte, SD 57369$1,324,016
10Sheldon Lee TobinPlankinton, SD 57368$1,306,430
11John Arlyn NydamStickney, SD 57375$1,216,362
12Steven Lee MohnenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,209,917
13Louise Ann GillenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,192,125
14Vernon Lee NilesWessington Springs, SD 57382$1,191,802
15Gregory KroupaWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,179,385
16Paul BorgmannWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,111,297
17Rodney L FaulhaberWessington Springs, SD 57382$1,054,215
18Johnson FarmsPlankinton, SD 57368$1,022,280
19Douglas VangorpStickney, SD 57375$1,007,182
20Robert D Bosworth Revocable Living TrustPlankinton, SD 57368$955,533

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag